Movie Review : X-Men Apocalypse
Someone once asked me if I watch
any reviews before watching a movie on the big screen. I told them that I just
get a feel of what critics are saying about the movie and go in blind. The
reason why I do this is because sometimes a film will split critics and casual
moviegoers in half.
This happens to be the case for
X-Men Apocalypse. For the life of me, I have no idea why critics have given
such scathing reviews for, what is in my opinion, a really good film. I loved X-Men
Apocalypse. It does have its fair share of flaws, but what I love most about the
movie is that it builds to the climax. It is a movie which expects the viewer
to be patient, and if you are the payoff you get in the end is well worth the
wait.
Story and Writing:
I’m sure anybody who has seen the
trailers for this movie knows the basic plot of X-Men Apocalypse. An age old
mutant rises, reigning apocalypse on the earth and it is up to the new X-Men to
stop them. Before I go any further I just want to say that the plot is not as
complex as X-Men Days of Future Past. That being said, the complexity that
Bryan Singer and Simon Kinberg, the writer, have managed to weave into this
simple concept is amazing.
When I returned from a night
screening of this movie at around 1:45 AM my biggest gripe about the film was
the pacing. But when I went to bed the time was 2:50 AM, and within this one
hour it dawned on me what a genius Bryan Singer was. He has crafted a movie
where the pace builds momentum as the story moves forward. Each scene leads
into the next and with each scene the tension and pace increases.
Many superhero movies are set at
a breakneck pace, moving from action sequence to exposition to action sequence
in a span of minutes. One of the things I loved about Captain America: Civil
War was its consistent, fast paced, storytelling. What I love about X-Men
Apocalypse is that it takes the time to set up its characters.
That being said, I do have a few
problems with the writing. A few of the characters felt a bit underdeveloped
and a bit rushed. While I loved the new mutants, there were some which I really
didn’t care much for. The ones in question are Angel and Cyclops and,
surprisingly even Storm to an extent.
Another gripe I have with the
writing is that as nuanced as Oscar Issac’s performance as Apocalypse was,
somehow the threat to the world never seemed credible to me. While I feared for
the safety for the X- Men on screen, I oddly felt nothing for the world getting
wrecked.
Acting:
The acting in this movie, save
for a few sore spots, is phenomenal. James Mcavoy is a gem of an actor, and
while Sir Patrick Stewart is, in my mind at least, the perfect Xavier, Mcavoy
comes really close. Michael Fassbender is a really good actor, period. In the
first half of the movie, the emotional weight comes from, surprisingly,
Magneto. Jennifer Lawrence, while not at her Oscar winning best, still brings a
lot to the screen as Mystique, although she appears to have taken a back seat
in the action scenes. And as I mentioned earlier, even though caked with makeup
and prosthetics, Oscar Issac shines as Apocalypse.
But in all of this, my favorite
performances were Sophie Turner (On a side note I am bingeing Game of Thrones so
that I can catch up to season six) as Jean Grey and Evan Peters as Quicksilver.
The scenes involving Quicksilver are the highlights of the film.
Olivia Munn as Psylocke, while
not fully developed, brings the necessary physicality to the screen and
Alexandra Shipp, who is one of my favorite up and coming actresses, is serviceable
as Storm. Maybe their roles in the future will expand them further.
But in all this, there were two
people who I could never buy in their roles. Maybe it was the writing, maybe it
was the acting, I’m not really sure but Lucas Till as Cyclops and Ben Hardy as
Angel stuck out like a sore thumb. While they stood their own in action scenes I
never felt anything for them as characters.
Cinematography, Editing and Visual Effects:
While Bryan Singer is not
particularly known to be a visually striking director, his visuals are nothing less
than what is expected. Most of the scenes are shot and edited on point. The only
scene I had a problem with was the cage fight between Angel and Nightcrawler,
which was edited in a really choppy manner.
The visual effects game was on
point for the most part, but in a movie like this I think the problem is that
when we see the destruction of the world it is through CGI, and however
brilliant it is, I still felt a disconnect. One of the things which I really
have to appreciate is the costume designing and
Makeup, especially on
Apocalypse and his four Horsemen.
The greatest achievement of this
film is every scene involving Quicksilver and it is worth watching in 3D just
for those.
As I mentioned Earlier in the
review, the editing suits the pacing of the movie and it works wonders. Probably
the one gripe I have about the visuals is that some of the wire work,
especially on beast, looked a bit odd just in a few scenes.
Music:
At this point in time, the X-Men
theme has become sort of an icon and John Ottman yet again delivers on his
promise of a solid soundtrack. The music swells when it needs to and stops when
it has to and unlike certain other superhero films the music, however great,
knows it has to take second place to the visuals *cough* Batman V Superman *Cough*.
Final Thoughts:
After watching this film,
something I found really interesting was that while it shares the same run time
with Captain America Civil War it handles its pacing in such a different
manner. X-Men Apocalypse in a way surprised me with the risks it took, and to
me it paid off. Many people may not agree with me and this all boils down to
one small word pacing. I am a person
who likes movies which maintain their pace and movies which build up to the
finale. X-Men Apocalypse is the latter.
To really understand and
appreciate X-Men Apocalypse to its fullest I think as moviegoers and fans we
need to have patience. In a way, I think, we have been spoilt by consistently fast-paced Marvel films. Not to take any praise away from Marvel but I give full credit
to Bryan Singer and his team of writers for making a movie which does not move at a breakneck speed.
I still think Civil War is the
better movie of the two. X-Men Apocalypse has a few problems of its own and
while Civil War rises above its problems in blazing glory, X-Men Apocalypse
just manages to struggle out of the rubble.
There have been rumors that this
is Bryan Singer’s Last X-Men movie. If that is the case, X-Men Apocalypse is a
fitting Swan song to a director who assembled a team of super heroes on the big
screen twelve years before the first Avengers Film.
Before I give my conclusion I need to acknowledge Wolverines Cameo. Hugh Jackman still embodies
the role, and if this film is a taste of what is to come in his final outing as
Logan, I’m waiting to see what they can do with an R rating.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, X-Men Apocalypse
is not by any means the best X-Men movie I have seen. It does have flaws. But despite
the flaws, this team of ragtag superheroes has a special place in my heart.
Most of the actors have been replaced or recast, but Bryan Singer managed to
make me care about most of them once again.
If you are a fan of well written
movies, you will not be disappointed with X-Men Apocalypse. The first twenty
minutes may seem like a drag, but the rest is worth the wait.
I give X-Men Apocalypse an 8 out of 10
The movie does have an end
credits scene, but you will get the reference only if you are a fan of the
comics. I hope that this is not Bryan Singer's final X-Men but I am happy nonetheless.
I’ll be back tomorrow with another post, so until then:
Peace!!!

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete